Privacy Law Library

Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence)

Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205)

Artificial intelligence · Employees

Enacted in 2024 as the first comprehensive U.S. state law on algorithmic discrimination, it requires developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to use reasonable care against algorithmic discrimination, with risk-management programs, impact assessments, consumer notices, correction and appeal rights, and disclosure when consumers interact with AI. The 2025 special session (SB 25B-004) moved its start date from February 1, 2026 to June 30, 2026. SB 26-189 repeals and reenacts Part 17 with a narrower automated decision-making framework effective January 1, 2027, so these duties are in force only for the interim. Enforcement is also on hold: in X.AI LLC v. Weiser (D. Colo. No. 1:26-cv-01515), a court order entered April 27, 2026 on the parties' stipulation bars the Attorney General from starting enforcement, including investigations, of SB 24-205 or legislation replacing it for conduct through 14 days after the court rules on xAI's forthcoming preliminary injunction motion.

Where
Colorado
Citation
C.R.S. 6-1-1701 to 6-1-1707 (as enacted by SB 24-205 and amended by SB 25B-004)
Status
Blocked by a court
In force since
2026-06-30
Last amended
2025-11-25
Enforced by
Colorado Attorney General (exclusive; 6-1-1706)
People can sue
No
Penalties
A violation is a deceptive trade practice under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (civil penalties up to $20,000 per violation, 6-1-112). Affirmative defense for compliance with a recognized AI risk-management framework plus discovery and cure of violations (6-1-1706).
Applies to
  • Developers and deployers doing business in Colorado of high-risk AI systems that make, or are a substantial factor in making, consequential decisions (education, employment, financial or lending, essential government services, health care, housing, insurance, legal services) about Colorado residents (6-1-1701)
  • Deployers with fewer than 50 full-time-equivalent employees that do not train the system with their own data are exempt from the risk-management, impact-assessment, and public-statement duties if conditions are met (6-1-1703(6))
  • Any person doing business in Colorado that deploys or makes available an AI system intended to interact with consumers (disclosure duty, 6-1-1704)

What a privacy notice must say

  • Deployers must publish a website statement on the high-risk systems they deploy and the information collected.C.R.S. 6-1-1703(5) · From 2026-06-30
  • Disclose to each consumer who interacts with a consumer-facing AI system that it is AI, unless obvious to a reasonable person.C.R.S. 6-1-1704 · From 2026-06-30
  • Developers must publish a statement summarizing the high-risk systems they make available and how they manage discrimination risks.C.R.S. 6-1-1702(4) · From 2026-06-30
  • Before a consequential decision, deployers must notify the consumer that a high-risk system is used and, after an adverse decision, explain the reasons and offer correction of personal data and an appeal with human review if feasible.C.R.S. 6-1-1703(4) · From 2026-06-30

Practices it requires

  • Deployers must implement a risk management policy and program and complete impact assessments annually and after substantial modifications.C.R.S. 6-1-1703(2)-(3) · Only if: Small-deployer exemption in 6-1-1703(6) · From 2026-06-30
  • Developers must use reasonable care to protect consumers from known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination and give deployers documentation needed for impact assessments.C.R.S. 6-1-1702(1)-(3) · From 2026-06-30

Other duties

  • Developers must disclose known or foreseeable discrimination risks to the Attorney General and known deployers within 90 days of discovery.C.R.S. 6-1-1702(5) · From 2026-06-30

Sources

Checked against these sources on 2026-09-25 by research agent (Claude), primary sources.

Unverified: Status 'enjoined' reflects a stipulated, court-ordered stay of state enforcement (not a merits ruling); the order was read from the CourtListener docket text, not the signed PDF. | The subsection numbers cited are from the 2024 CRS text; SB 25B-004 changed dates only.

Research reference, not legal advice.