Privacy Law Library

Online services, products, or features likely to be accessed by children (AB 2246, 2026 replacement of the Age-Appropriate Design Code)

AB 2246 Children's Online Design Law

Children

Signed September 10, 2026, AB 2246 repeals the 2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code and re-enacts a narrower version: age estimation (tied to the Digital Age Assurance Act signals) or child protections for all users, high-privacy defaults, limits on profiling, data collection, and precise geolocation, and a new duty to take reasonable steps to prevent listed harms to children. It drops the data protection impact assessment and 'best interests' tests that courts had enjoined, and it lets a child void contract terms obtained through a design feature.

Where
California
Citation
Cal. Civ. Code 1798.99.28-1798.99.34 (Title 1.81.47, as added by Stats. 2026, Ch. 187)
Status
Enacted, not yet in force
In force since
2027-01-01
Enforced by
California Attorney General and public prosecutors
People can sue
No
Penalties
Civil penalty up to $5,000 per affected child per negligent violation and $15,000 per affected child per intentional violation, in actions by the AG or a public prosecutor (1798.99.32).
Applies to
  • Businesses (CCPA definitions) providing an online service, product, or feature likely to be accessed by children under 18, judged by listed indicators such as COPPA child-directed status, audience data, and child-oriented design (1798.99.28)
  • Excludes broadband, telecommunications services, and delivery of physical products

Rights it gives people

  • A child may void contract terms entered into because of a design feature of the service.Cal. Civ. Code 1798.99.31 · From 2027-01-01

Practices it requires

  • Estimate child users' age with reasonable certainty (may rely on Digital Age Assurance Act signals) or apply child protections to all consumers.Cal. Civ. Code 1798.99.29(a)(1) · From 2027-01-01
  • Set children's default privacy settings to a high level of privacy; provide clear, age-appropriate privacy information and privacy tools; signal to the child when monitored or tracked.Cal. Civ. Code 1798.99.29(a)(2)-(5) · From 2027-01-01
  • Do not profile a child by default unless safeguards exist and profiling is necessary for the service or for the child's safety, privacy, or education.Cal. Civ. Code 1798.99.29(b)(1) · From 2027-01-01
  • Do not collect, sell, share, or retain unnecessary personal information of children, or reuse it for other purposes.Cal. Civ. Code 1798.99.29(b)(2)-(3) · From 2027-01-01
  • Do not collect children's precise geolocation by default unless strictly necessary, and show an obvious sign while collecting it.Cal. Civ. Code 1798.99.29(b)(4)-(5) · From 2027-01-01
  • Do not use dark patterns to get children to provide more data or give up privacy protections; do not reuse or over-retain age-estimation data.Cal. Civ. Code 1798.99.29(b)(6)-(7) · From 2027-01-01
  • Take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable physical or financial harm, severe psychological harm, highly offensive privacy intrusions, and unlawful discrimination against children.Cal. Civ. Code 1798.99.30(a) · From 2027-01-01

Sources

Checked against these sources on 2026-09-25 by research agent (Claude), primary sources.

Unverified: Effective date assumed to be January 1, 2027 under the default rule for 2026 regular-session statutes; the bill text shows no urgency clause or separate operative date.

Research reference, not legal advice.