Maryland Wiretap and Electronic Surveillance Act
MD Wiretap Act
Communications
Maryland is an all-party consent state: a private person may record or intercept a phone call, electronic communication, or private in-person conversation only if they are a party and every party has consented in advance. The Act also bars disclosing or using contents known to be illegally intercepted, and it sets out narrow exceptions for service providers, law enforcement investigations, and police and correctional body-worn cameras.
- Where
- Maryland
- Citation
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. §§ 10-401 to 10-414
- Status
- In force
- Last amended
- 2025-10-01
- Enforced by
- State's Attorneys and the Attorney General (criminal); private civil action by persons whose communications are intercepted, disclosed, or used (10-410)
- People can sue
- Yes
- Penalties
- Willful interception, disclosure, or use is a felony punishable by up to 5 years' imprisonment and/or a $10,000 fine (10-402(b)). Civil plaintiffs may recover actual damages but at least the greater of $100 per day of violation or $1,000, plus punitive damages and attorney's fees (10-410(a)).
- Applies to
- Any person, including individuals, businesses, and state and local employees or agents (10-401 definition of person)
- Wire, electronic, and oral communications; an oral communication is words spoken in private conversation (10-401)
Practices it requires
- Do not willfully intercept, or procure another to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication except as the subtitle allows.Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)
- A private party may intercept a communication only if a party to it and all parties have given prior consent, and not for a criminal or tortious purpose.Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(c)(3)
- Do not willfully disclose or use the contents of a communication knowing or having reason to know it was unlawfully intercepted.Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(2)-(3)
Other duties
- Communication service providers' employees may intercept, disclose, or use communications only in the normal course of employment as necessary to provide service or protect the provider's rights or property.Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(c)(1)(i)
- Law enforcement and, since 2025-10-01, correctional officers may record oral communications with body-worn cameras only when in uniform or displaying a badge, a party to the conversation, following use standards, and giving notice of recording when practicable.Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(c)(11)
Sources
- Official text
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-401 (definitions)
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402 (prohibitions and exceptions)
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-410 (civil action)
- 2025 Md. Laws ch. 609 (HB 176), correctional officer body-worn cameras, effective 2025-10-01
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-414 (last section of subtitle)
Checked against these sources on 2026-09-25 by research agent (Claude), primary sources.
Unverified: Original enactment date (1977) not verified from a primary source; effective_date left null.
Research reference, not legal advice.