Privacy Law Library

Preventing Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Digital Depictions Act

Colorado intimate deepfakes (SB 25-288)

Artificial intelligence · Other

SB 25-288 lets people sue anyone who knowingly or recklessly discloses, or threatens to disclose, a realistic AI-generated or edited intimate image of them without consent. It also extends Colorado's crimes for posting private intimate images, and its child sexual exploitation laws, to realistic computer-generated depictions.

Where
Colorado
Citation
C.R.S. 13-21-1501 to 13-21-1507; 18-7-107, 18-7-108 (as amended)
Status
In force
In force since
2025-08-06
Enforced by
Depicted individuals (civil action); district attorneys (criminal offenses)
People can sue
Yes
Penalties
Plaintiffs may recover the defendant's monetary gain, actual damages or $150,000 liquidated damages, exemplary damages, attorney fees, and injunctive relief (13-21-1506). Related crimes of disclosing a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction for harassment or pecuniary gain (18-7-107, 18-7-108).
Applies to
  • Any person who discloses or threatens to disclose an intimate digital depiction (a realistic but false AI- or computer-generated intimate image) of an identifiable individual without consent; technology providers are excepted from civil liability (13-21-1503, 13-21-1504)

Rights it gives people

  • Plaintiffs may proceed under privacy protections such as pseudonyms.C.R.S. 13-21-1505

Practices it requires

  • Do not disclose or threaten to disclose an intimate digital depiction of an identifiable person without consent, knowing or recklessly disregarding the lack of consent and likely severe distress.C.R.S. 13-21-1503
  • Disclosing a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction to harass or for pecuniary gain is a crime.C.R.S. 18-7-107; 18-7-108 (as amended by SB 25-288)

Sources

Checked against these sources on 2026-09-25 by research agent (Claude), primary sources.

Unverified: Plaintiff-privacy mechanism in 13-21-1505 summarized from the section heading only.

Research reference, not legal advice.