Unlawful dissemination of intimate images, including realistic digitally created depictions
ORS 163.472; 30.833
Artificial intelligence · Other
Oregon's nonconsensual intimate image law makes it a crime, and a civil wrong, to share someone's intimate images to harass, humiliate or injure them. HB 2299 (2025) extended it from January 1, 2026 to realistic AI-generated or digitally altered 'deepfake' images.
- Where
- Oregon
- Citation
- ORS 163.472; ORS 30.833; ORS 30.834
- Status
- In force
- Last amended
- 2026-01-01
- Enforced by
- District attorneys (criminal); private civil actions (ORS 30.833, 30.834)
- People can sue
- Yes
- Penalties
- Class A misdemeanor; Class C felony with a prior conviction (ORS 163.472(2)). Civil action for the greater of actual damages or $5,000 statutory damages per defendant, plus disgorgement, punitive damages and attorney fees (ORS 30.833). Separate civil action for unsolicited electronic transmission of intimate images: greater of damages up to $10,000 or $500 (ORS 30.834).
- Applies to
- Any person who knowingly discloses an intimate image of another with intent to harass, humiliate or injure, knowing the person did not consent; since 2026-01-01 this includes reasonably realistic digitally created, manipulated or altered depictions (ORS 163.472(3)(b)(B), HB 2299)
- Excludes interactive computer service providers for third-party content (ORS 163.472(4)(g))
Practices it requires
- Do not disclose an intimate image of another person without consent with intent to harass, humiliate or injure.ORS 163.472(1)
- The prohibition covers reasonably realistic digitally created, manipulated or altered depictions.ORS 163.472(3)(b)(B) · From 2026-01-01
- Adults may not send unsolicited intimate images electronically to harass, degrade or humiliate the recipient.ORS 30.834(2)
Sources
- Official text
- ORS 163.472 (ORS chapter 163, 2025 edition)
- ORS 30.833, 30.834 (ORS chapter 30, 2025 edition)
- 2025 Or. Laws ch. 116 (HB 2299), effective 2026-01-01
Checked against these sources on 2026-09-25 by research agent (Claude), primary sources.
Unverified: Original effective date (2015 c.379) not fetched.
Research reference, not legal advice.